The Spinning Wheel Effect

I’ve been reminded lately about the story of Sleeping Beauty. You know the one… evil fairy casts a curse over a baby princess resulting in a dramatic 21st birthday at which she’ll prick her finger on a spinning wheel and fall asleep until a prince can rescue her. Here’s a great animated version here:

In their wisdom, her parents decide to rid the land of all of the spinning wheels to ensure Sleeping Beauty’s safety. Inevitably, on her aforementioned birthday, she went looking. She found a spinning wheel, pricked her finger and fell asleep.

It all leads me to this question – What if?

What if her parents had educated her about the spinning wheel, helped her to gain competencies in spinning-wheel skills, assisted her in navigating everything ‘spinning-wheel’? Heaven forbid, what if they had actually told her the truth about spinning-wheels?

Now replace ‘Spinning-wheel’ with ‘social-media’. What if we educate our students in social media, we help them gain competencies in it, we assist them in navigating and using social media? What if we tell our students the truth about social media?

Isn’t it the truth that we love it? Can’t get enough of it? Love to hate it?

Isn’t it the truth that we judge people by it? Choose to keep or lose connections by it?

Isn’t it the truth that we use it when we’re bored? Needy? Procrastinating?

Isn’t it true that we use it as a form of procrastination?

I was inspired this week by a keynote by Jason Ohler (twitter.com/jasonohler). He spoke about how he asks his students to ‘google’ themselves in order to discover their online persona. Then he asks them “Do you like what you see?” and “Is this how you want people to know you?” Then… and only then… he helps them to fix it up. Just like the Prince in Sleeping Beauty.

My first thought was ‘I want to do that’. However, my students (year 5/6) don’t really have an online presence yet.* And then my eyes were opened. Perhaps I could do what the parents should have done in the Sleeping Beauty story. Perhaps I could help them gain competencies in Social Media. Perhaps I could show them examples of a positive online presence and get them to make a projected Facebook/Twitter page.

I knew my students needed a social media hero. There could only be one. Me. This would prove to be one of the scariest days of my teaching career.

I showed my students what happens when I google ‘Chantelle Morrison’. Then, I showed them my Twitter page. And my Facebook page (insert racing heart-beat sound here).

We discussed them. Out loud. I asked them ” Would you be happy if this was your online presence?”.  They asked me “Are you happy that this is your online presence?”. We discussed what could be improved/added/changed/deleted. Wowsers. Their resounding response was that my online profile was fine. For me. And I was happy with that.

Students then made their own fake pages on blank templates  – a prediction of what they would like their pages to look like when they do get an online presence. Check out these 2 examples:

Happy with that.***

* They think we don’t know that they use pseudonyms to create Facebook accounts;)

** Who taught them to use pseudonyms?… I did. But not for that purpose.

*** Perhaps I could ‘time-capsule these for 2 years time and compare.

Advertisements

Controversy Reigns

We know it was controversial. We knew it would be a tough day. And still, we did it.

For years, educators and psychologists alike having been continuing the work of Jane Elliott to help educate children and adults about their own and others’ true beliefs about race and discrimination. 

The most amazing part is that Jane Elliott began her study in Middle America, 1963 in a little town called Riceville. She began by telling her class that they didn’t really understand how to treat all American citizens as ‘brothers’. She then proceeded to segregate her class into the ‘brown-eyed’ children and ‘blue-eyed’ children; favouring the blue-eyed children and discriminating against the brown-eyed children. The results are quite startling.

Check out one clip here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hqp6GnYqIjQ.

In the Zone, we teachers had noticed that our students, as a whole, also don’t really know how to treat all Australians as brothers and/or sisters. We had noticed a few comments, particularly in relation to Indigenous Australians. I hate to think what our students might say about some other cultures in Australia. 

As I was about to embark on a Unit of Work on ‘Human Rights’ with my AIM class, I had planned to do the ‘Blue-eyes/Brown-eyes’ exercise anyway. [NB: Two years ago, I had simply shown the video to my students and they had wished that we conducted the “real” exercise.] Following the a fore-mentioned observations,  we agreed that we would run the exercise across Stage 3 for one day; leaving the last session for debriefing.

In the end, we would only run it for 1/2 a normal school day.Image

We followed Jane Elliott’s original procedure with the exception that the favoured group would be those with brown eyes. The exercise’s success would be pinged on convincing the students that the teachers really believed that brown-eyed people were better than blue-eyed people. By 10am, skeptical students had begun to believe that the teachers weren’t mucking around. [NB. My AIM class had started a study of Human Rights the previous day and I had suspected that they might cotton-on. They were instructed not to discuss their observations with anyone else].

Many of the teachers observed that it was the hardest day in their teaching career. It’s certainly not a pleasant one. As staff, we ensured that we had emailed the parents an outline so that they were able to debrief with their children afterwards and in the end, we allowed a full 1/2 day to debrief.

Although we didn’t have punch-ups like Jane Elliott’s class, we definitely had teasing. At recess, a number of students were heard teasing the blue-eyed children. They were calling them simply that – “Blue-eyed”. Nearly 50 years on from the original exercise and the children’s responses were still the same. Interesting.

What was also interesting was that some students whose parents work at the school immediately ran to that adult at the first opportunity to talk about the injustice. One student even texted his father in the break to ask if he could be removed from the school. All the students who went to their parents had blue-eyes. My first question is this: Would the students have run to their parents if they didn’t have blue-eyes? Would they have spoken out against the injustice done to others?

Before we had our debrief, we asked students to write about their feelings of the day. Talk about stimulated to write! They could have kept going for far longer than the allocated 20 minutes. Here are some student observations.

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

So… was it worth it? In my opinion, it was a hard day but a worthwhile day. And as we’ve been teaching our students; Hard = Good.

Are you wondering about the community’s reaction? We had a number of emails from both parents and students. One was negative (parent of a blue-eyed student) and the rest were overwhelmingly positive. One parent even said “Please do this for every Stage 3 group!”.

Should you try it?

I’ll leave that you and your team to decide.